<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rethinking The Oscar Yet?</title>
	<link>http://sio.jameswlanning.com/2007/12/21/rethinking-the-oscar-yet/</link>
	<description>I'll Take Your Best Shot</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ky</title>
		<link>http://sio.jameswlanning.com/2007/12/21/rethinking-the-oscar-yet/#comment-51859</link>
		<dc:creator>ky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sio.jameswlanning.com/2007/12/21/rethinking-the-oscar-yet/#comment-51859</guid>
		<description>jeff i agree but james sole resion for counterdicitng global warming was the senate i mearly chose to attack the only point that he made.

"religious fanatic" LMAO me HA!!!

anyways there is no lack in consensous by peer reviwed journals the only people in disagreement are the popular press who once again are uneducated idots</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jeff i agree but james sole resion for counterdicitng global warming was the senate i mearly chose to attack the only point that he made.</p>
<p>&#8220;religious fanatic&#8221; LMAO me HA!!!</p>
<p>anyways there is no lack in consensous by peer reviwed journals the only people in disagreement are the popular press who once again are uneducated idots</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://sio.jameswlanning.com/2007/12/21/rethinking-the-oscar-yet/#comment-51829</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sio.jameswlanning.com/2007/12/21/rethinking-the-oscar-yet/#comment-51829</guid>
		<description>That was for "ky".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was for &#8220;ky&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://sio.jameswlanning.com/2007/12/21/rethinking-the-oscar-yet/#comment-51828</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sio.jameswlanning.com/2007/12/21/rethinking-the-oscar-yet/#comment-51828</guid>
		<description>Can anyone say religious fanatic?  None are so blind as those who refuse to see!  The senate is hardly the only source for debate on anthropogenic global warming, the fallacy of consensus, and the biased IPCC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone say religious fanatic?  None are so blind as those who refuse to see!  The senate is hardly the only source for debate on anthropogenic global warming, the fallacy of consensus, and the biased IPCC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ky</title>
		<link>http://sio.jameswlanning.com/2007/12/21/rethinking-the-oscar-yet/#comment-51796</link>
		<dc:creator>ky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 05:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sio.jameswlanning.com/2007/12/21/rethinking-the-oscar-yet/#comment-51796</guid>
		<description>ok james its gotta be said that the report from the senate was fucked with by people with no real understanding of any type of sience.... if u read other articals from the freedom of information act and watch C-span and see these uneducated idots depating their report ud understand... but once again u like most americans take one damn pice of info from the senate and regard it as pure fact, without ever turning on c-span or learning how these fat cats came to a conclushion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok james its gotta be said that the report from the senate was fucked with by people with no real understanding of any type of sience&#8230;. if u read other articals from the freedom of information act and watch C-span and see these uneducated idots depating their report ud understand&#8230; but once again u like most americans take one damn pice of info from the senate and regard it as pure fact, without ever turning on c-span or learning how these fat cats came to a conclushion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonnie</title>
		<link>http://sio.jameswlanning.com/2007/12/21/rethinking-the-oscar-yet/#comment-51689</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 04:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sio.jameswlanning.com/2007/12/21/rethinking-the-oscar-yet/#comment-51689</guid>
		<description>This is a totally random comment that I should probably just send you a message about, but I wouldn't want to pass up the opportunity to make my comment number go up ;) 
Are you familiar with Ron Block's music? Since you have such electic tastes that reach all the way from POD to AKUS, you might like it. Some of it's bluegrass, some of it is more rock. Good stuff 8)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a totally random comment that I should probably just send you a message about, but I wouldn&#8217;t want to pass up the opportunity to make my comment number go up <img src='http://sio.jameswlanning.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Are you familiar with Ron Block&#8217;s music? Since you have such electic tastes that reach all the way from POD to AKUS, you might like it. Some of it&#8217;s bluegrass, some of it is more rock. Good stuff <img src='http://sio.jameswlanning.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
